SEO Groww
Meta Tags
Open Graph GeneratorTwitter Card GeneratorMeta Description GeneratorJSON-LD Generator
Audit & Check
SEO CheckerOn-Page SEO AuditReadability CheckerSite CrawlerBulk SEO Checker
Keywords & SERP
Keyword Density CheckerSERP Snippet Preview
Technical SEO
Canonical Tag GeneratorRobots.txt GeneratorXML Sitemap GeneratorHreflang GeneratorRedirect Generatorllms.txt Generator
AI Tools
AI SEO FixerSERP Competitor AnalysisCTR Score CheckerAI Keyword ResearchAI Content BriefAI Search Visibility
Accessibility
WCAG Contrast CheckerTarget Size CheckerFocus Appearance CheckerWCAG 2.2 Checklist
Ad Tech
GPT Lazy Load Generator
ContactOpen the studio

#ffffff on #16a34a contrast ratio

3.29:1

White text (#ffffff) on a dark green (Tailwind green-600) background (#16a34a) is only acceptable for large text and UI components under WCAG 2.2. It passes 2 of 5 checks below.

Swap: #16a34a on #ffffff

Large text sample

Normal body text in #ffffff on #16a34a. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.

WCAG 2.2 results

WCAG 2.2 contrast results for #ffffff on #16a34a
Normal text — WCAG 1.4.3 AA4.5:1Fail
Large text — WCAG 1.4.3 AA3:1Pass
UI components & icons — WCAG 1.4.11 AA3:1Pass
Normal text — WCAG 1.4.6 AAA7:1Fail
Large text — WCAG 1.4.6 AAA4.5:1Fail

Nearest passing colours

How it looks with colour blindness

Simulated with the Machado et al. (2009) model at full severity.

  • Aa

    Protanopia (no red cones)

    3.04:1

  • Aa

    Deuteranopia (no green cones)

    3.51:1

  • Aa

    Tritanopia (no blue cones)

    3.26:1

  • Aa

    Achromatopsia (no colour)

    3.27:1

Try a different pair

Colours

Hex, rgb() or hsl(). Alpha is composited.

Permalink

Preview

Large heading text

Normal body text at 14 px. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.

Outlined buttonA text link

Colour-blindness preview

Simulated with Machado et al. (2009), full severity.

  • AaProtanopia (no red cones)3.04:1
  • AaDeuteranopia (no green cones)3.51:1
  • AaTritanopia (no blue cones)3.26:1
  • AaAchromatopsia (no colour)3.27:1

Contrast ratio

3.29:1

WCAG 2.2 contrast verdicts
CheckCriterionNeedsResult
Normal text1.4.3 AA4.5:1Fail
Large text1.4.3 AA3:1Pass
UI components & graphics1.4.11 AA3:1Pass
Normal text1.4.6 AAA7:1Fail
Large text1.4.6 AAA4.5:1Fail

Nearest passing colours

Same hue, lightness adjusted in OKLCH.

AA — 4.5:1

Change text

#272727 · 4.53:1

Change background

#008931 · 4.54:1

AAA — 7:1

Change text: no colour with this hue reaches the target.

Change background

#006809 · 7.03:1

Large text means at least 24 CSS px, or 18.66 CSS px bold. Ratios are truncated, never rounded, so 4.49:1 is shown as failing 4.5:1.

Questions about this pair

Is #ffffff on #16a34a accessible?
Only for large text. At 3.29:1 it meets the 3:1 large-text and UI-component thresholds but fails the 4.5:1 needed for normal body text.
What is the contrast ratio of #ffffff and #16a34a?
3.29:1, calculated with the WCAG 2.2 relative luminance formula. The ratio is truncated, not rounded, so it never shows a failing pair as passing.
What colour passes AA on #16a34a?
#272727 is the closest colour to #ffffff — same hue, adjusted lightness — that reaches 4.5:1 on #16a34a.

Related colour pairs