Free AI Search Visibility Checker
Check whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Copilot can reach, read and quote your page. Get a per-crawler verdict from your own robots.txt, a warning if your content only exists after JavaScript runs, and a citability score for how the page is written.
Reads the page, its robots.txt and its llms.txt, then reports which AI crawlers can reach it, whether your content survives without JavaScript, and how quotable the writing is. No AI is used to produce this report — every check is deterministic.
Private by design
Tags are built in your browser. Nothing is uploaded unless you ask for an AI suggestion or a URL audit.
See it before you ship
Live Google, Facebook and X previews render exactly what your link will look like.
Scored as you type
Real-time character guidance so titles and descriptions land inside the ranges that survive truncation.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between blocking GPTBot and blocking OAI-SearchBot?
GPTBot collects pages to train OpenAI's models. OAI-SearchBot builds the index ChatGPT search cites from. Blocking GPTBot keeps your writing out of training and changes nothing about whether ChatGPT can link to you; blocking OAI-SearchBot removes you from ChatGPT's answers outright. Sites that meant to do the first and did the second are the single most common problem this tool finds.
Does blocking Google-Extended hurt my Google rankings?
No. Google-Extended only controls whether your content is used by Gemini and Vertex AI grounding. Search ranking and AI Overview eligibility both follow ordinary Googlebot access, so you can opt out of Gemini training without losing Search presence.
Why does JavaScript matter for AI search?
AI crawlers generally do not execute JavaScript the way Googlebot does. If your page ships an empty div and paints the article client-side, the crawler sees the empty div. This tool counts the words present in the raw HTML response so you can see exactly what they get.
What actually makes a page more likely to be quoted?
Being reachable first, then being easy to extract: a short self-contained answer near the top, headings phrased the way people ask, lists and tables that survive chunking, and structured data naming an author and a date. None of that is a ranking trick — it is the same writing that helps a human skim.
Is llms.txt worth publishing?
It is an emerging convention, not a standard, and no engine is obliged to read it. But it is one small Markdown file pointing crawlers at the pages you actually want read, so the cost of publishing one is close to zero while support settles.
Does this tool use AI to grade my page?
No. Every check is deterministic: the crawler verdicts come from matching your robots.txt the way crawlers do, and the citability score is a fixed checklist. Run it twice and you get the same answer, which is not true of anything graded by a model.